We are committed to providing fast, efficient, and affordable software solutions that set new standards in the software development industry.
  • What is S.M.A.R.T.

Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology, often abbreviated as S.M.A.R.T., is a hardware monitoring tool that is designed to detect early warning signs of hard drive failure so the user can take the necessary action to prevent data loss or corruption. Compatible with both hard disk drives (HDDs) and some solid-state drives (SSDs), S.M.A.R.T. has saved countless files and untold amounts of data over the years.

The Evolution of S.M.A.R.T.
Like most other forms of technology, S.M.A.R.T. has undergone many changes since its original inception. The earliest version of S.M.A.R.T. didnEt provide much more than basic drive failure prediction, which it achieved by monitoring the activities of online and active drives.

The next version included substantial improvements to the failure prediction functionality of S.M.A.R.T. One of the ways it achieved this was through the implementation of automated, offline read scans. It also adds failure prevention via sector error detection and repair.

Finally, the most recent version of S.M.A.R.T. adds on top of the previous iterations by testing all drive sectors - and the data therein - to verify drive and data health.

How Does S.M.A.R.T. Work?
At the most basic level, S.M.A.R.T. works by scanning and monitoring the health of your hard drives. Generally speaking, modern hard drive failures are lumped into one of two categories:

  • Predictable: These failures include mechanical wear and the degradation of data storage surfaces. According to some studies, mechanical failures comprise approximately 60% of all hard drive failures in consumer systems.
  • Unpredictable: Failures that cannot be reasonably predicted fall into this category. These failures often stem from hardware misuse.

The S.M.A.R.T. protocol focuses on predictable failures, which are automatically documented and tracked. Your status can be checked in a number of ways, but most drive manufacturers offer proprietary utilities that let you view any current failures.

If you are specifically concerned about a driveEs S.M.A.R.T. status, you can also run a S.M.A.R.T. test. However, this test does require specialized software.

Common S.M.A.R.T. Warning Signs
However, S.M.A.R.T. ultimately tracks approximately 50 different attributes related to your driveEs health. Since some of them are more important than others, itEs crucial that you know which ones can be ignored and which ones require immediate action.

  • Reallocated Sector Counts: This attribute tracks how many times a damaged drive sector has been reallocated or remapped. ItEs generally an indicator of excessive wear and tear in both HDDs and SSDs.
  • Current Pending Sector Counts: This attribute tracks the overall number of unstable or damaged sectors that have yet to be remapped. Again, this can be indicative of excessive wear.

Some attributes are more relevant to SSDs rather than HDDs. These include:

  • Erase Fail Count: This attribute tracks the number of deletion attempts that have failed. ItEs usually indicative of an SSD that is failing.
  • Wear Leveling Count: This attribute provides an estimation of the overall health of your drive. Higher numbers mean a greater amount of wear and tear on your drive.

While some of S.M.A.R.T.Es results have been criticized in the past, and itEs accuracy has been question by some data scientists, itEs still an effective means of predicting drive failures - even if itEs not perfect.

You may read more about S.M.A.R.T. in Wikipedia: Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology.

Data Recovery Feedback
370 feedbacks
Rating: 4.8 / 5
I really love your R-Studio product, I am doing Data Recovery as a professional, I used RS since the early versions and I loved the product, as far as I can tell, R-Studio, especially the Tech Version (but including the standard) is one of the best and excellent tools for a pro to have in the arsenal of tools in a pro DR lab, especially combining with the specialized Data Recovery hardware providers like DeepSpar, and PC3000, the rest of `wannabees` out there are waste of time, strongly recommend
I lost more than 200K files from my NAS due to a mistake. I tried 3 different recovery solutions over the 4 TB raid disks, and all of them performed ok but to be honest none of them were able to Raw recover the files and rename them with meaningful names out of the Metadata like R-TT did, then I was able to sort again my files and pictures and kind of restore all of them.

R-TT may not be the easiest or most user-friendly solution, but the algorithm used for the renaming saved me THOUSAND of hours of opening ...
Just recovered my old ext4 partition with R-Studio after trying testdisk and R-Linux without success. That partition was overwritten by another ext4 partition and I was losing my hope until I tried R-Studio demo. It detected all my files and directories again!

Bought it and 100% recommend it for anyone with a similar issue.
Genuinely tried every free program available without luck of recovering a deleted file from months ago. Thinking my file was deleted forever and lose all hope I came across this website as a recommendation.

I was reluctant as it seemed pricey compared to other programs, but damn worth every penny. It managed to even find files I thought were wiped from existence.

Kudos to r-tools, thank you!
Why make incremental backups, when there is R-Studio?

I`m an IT professional who has worked from home for over a decade. Early on in my career, I configured an HP ProLiant Server (Raid 1+0) as a workstation that I would remote into from my laptop. As technology evolved, I began to use it only for email and as a config file repository.

A short while ago, one of the drives degraded, but the HP ProLiant Server (Raid 1+0) still functioned fine on the remaining drive. I was complacent and didn`t replace the ...